ZAAWANSOWANE STRATEGIE REKONSTRUKCYJNE W URAZACH NERWÓW
I SPLOTU RAMIENNEGO – WSPÓŁPRACA INTERDYSCYPLINARNA POMIĘDZY
CHIRURGIEM RĘKI A NEUROFIZJOLOGIEM
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences,
Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences,
Poznan, Poland
Data nadesłania: 16-12-2025
Data akceptacji: 03-01-2026
Data publikacji: 16-03-2026
Autor do korespondencji
Michał Górecki
Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery,
Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. 135/147,
61-545 Poznan, Poland
Issue Rehabil. Orthop. Neurophysiol. Sport Promot. 2025;52(3):21-34
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Urazy splotu ramiennego i głównych nerwów to jedne z najbardziej skomplikowanych wyzwań
w chirurgii rekonstrukcyjnej. Długi czas regeneracji, szybki zanik mięśni i ryzyko trwałej utra
ty funkcji wymagają stosowania zaawansowanych technik mikrochirurgicznych. Przypadki te
koniecznie obejmują ścisłą, interdyscyplinarną współpracę neurofizjologa z chirurgiem ręki lub
chirurgiem nerwów. Niniejszy przegląd omawia obecne metody rekonstrukcji nerwów, takie jak
bezpośredni szew nerwu, autologiczne i allogeniczne przeszczepy nerwów, transfery koniec do
boku, odwrócony koniec do boku oraz bezpośrednie transfery nerwów i procedury z użyciem
badań przewodnictwa nerwowego. Podkreśla także kluczową rolę neurofizjologii w decyzjach
klinicznych, zarówno diagnostycznych, jak i śródoperacyjnych.
REFERENCJE (47)
1.
Czarnecki P, Górecki M, Romanowski L. Factors affecting the final outcomes after reconstruction of the median and ulnar nerve at the level of the forearm: analysis of 41 patients. Injury 2020; 51: 2910–2915.
2.
Rosen JM, Jewett DL. Nerve repair. In: Physiologic Methods of Evaluating Experimental Nerve Repairs. St Louis: Mosby; 1980. p. 15–161.
3.
Czarnecki P. Brachial plexus injury. Assessment and treatment. Issue Rehabil Orthop Neurophysiol Sport Promot 2016; 14: 45–52.
4.
McMorrow LA, Czarnecki P, Reid AJ, Tos P. Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024; 49: 698–711.
5.
Sakellariou VI, Badilas NK, Stavropoulos NA,et al. Treatment options for brachial plexus injuries.ISRN Orthop 2014; 2014: 314137. DOI:10.1155/2014/314137.
6.
Wiertel-Krawczuk A, Szymankiewicz-Szukała A, Huber J. Brachial plexus injury influences efferent transmission on more than just the symptomatic side. Biomedicines 2024; 12: 1401. DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12071401.
7.
Chuang DC. Brachial plexus injury: nerve reconstruction and functioning muscle transplantation.Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24: 57–66.
8.
Wiertel-Krawczuk A, Huber J. Standard neurophysiological studies and motor evoked potentials in evaluation of traumatic brachial plexus injuries – a brief review. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2018; 52: 549–554.
9.
Seddon HJ. A classification of nerve injuries.Br Med J 1942; 2: 237–239.
10.
Biso GMNR, Munakomi S. Neuroanatomy, neurapraxia.In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
11.
Conforti L, Gilley J, Coleman MP. Wallerian degeneration:an emerging axon death pathway linking injury and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014; 15: 394–409.
12.
Panzer KV, Burrell JC, Helm KVT, et al. Tissue engineered bands of Büngner for accelerated motor and sensory axonal outgrowth. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8: 580654. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.580654.
13.
Sulaiman W, Gordon T. Neurobiology of peripheral nerve injury, regeneration, and functional recovery. Ochsner J 2013; 13: 100–108.
14.
Czarnecki P, Górecki M. Reverse end-to-side technique (RETS) – supercharge and babysitting effect in median and ulnar nerve injuries. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2023; 88: 120–126.
15.
Althagafi A, Nadi M. Acute nerve injury. In:StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;2025.
16.
Hostiuc S, Ciobanu OM, Popa E, et al. Clinical anatomy and diagnostic challenges in peripheral nerve trauma for the forensic physician. Diagnostics 2025; 15: 1597. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15131597.
17.
Soczka A, Czarnecki P, Romanowski L. What to expect and how to discuss outcomes after nerve surgery repair. Issue Rehabil Orthop Neurophysiol Sport Promot 2017; 19: 6–14.
18.
Dy CJ, Colorado BS, Landau AJ, Brogan DM. Interpretation of electrodiagnostic studies how to apply it to the practice of orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29: e646–e654. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00322.
19.
Feinberg J. EMG: myths and facts. HSS J 2006; 2: 19–21.
20.
Czarnecki P, Huber J, Szukała A, Górecki M, Romanowski L. The usefulness of motor potentials evoked transvertebrally for evaluation of peroneal nerve regeneration in rats. J Pers Med 2023;13: 438. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13030438.
21.
Czarnecki P, Siemionow M, Baek GH, Górecki M,Romanowski L. Hand and wrist – what the hand surgeon wants to know from the radiologist. Pol J Radiol 2024; 89: 70–79.
22.
Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injuries. 2nd ed. Atlas of Neurosurgical Techniques. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2016. DOI: 10.1055/b-0036-136850.
23.
Rowshan K, Jones NF, Gupta R. Current surgical techniques of peripheral nerve repair. Oper Tech Orthop 2004; 14: 163–170.
24.
Millesi H. Nerve grafting. In: Slutsky D, Hentz V, eds. Peripheral nerve surgery: practical applications in the upper extremity. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 9–59.
25.
Mackinnon SE, Hudson AR. Clinical application of peripheral nerve transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 695–699.
26.
Hudson TW, Liu SY, Schmidt CE. Engineering an improved acellular nerve graft via optimized chemical processing. Tissue Eng 2004; 10: 1346–1358.
27.
Lans J, Eberlin KR, Evans PJ, Mercer D, Greenberg JA, Styron JF. Comparative effectiveness of allografts, autografts, and conduits in nerve gap repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151: 814e–827e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010088.
28.
Czarnecki P. Secondary and salvage procedures in nerve injuries. Issue Rehabil Orthop Neurophysiol Sport Promot 2017; 19: 41–49.
29.
Pan D, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction. Muscle Nerve 2020; 61: 726–739.
30.
Chiriac S, Facca S, Diaconu M, Gouzou S, Liverneaux P. Experience of using the bioresorbable copolyester poly (DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone) nerve conduit for peripheral nerve defects. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 20; 37: 342–349.
31.
Deal DN, Griffin JW, Hogan MV. Nerve conduits for nerve repair or reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20: 63–68.
32.
Czarnecki P, Górecki M, Romanowski L. Results of nerve transfers and secondary procedures to restore shoulder and elbow function. J Clin Med. 2024; 13: 7396. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237396.
33.
Gohritz A, Laengle G, Boesendorfer A, et al. Nerve transfers for brachial plexus reconstruction in patients over 60 years. J Pers Med 2023; 13: 659. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040659.
34.
Bertelli JA, Soldado F, Rodríguez-Baeza A, Ghizoni MF. Transfer of the motor branch of the abductor digiti quinti for thenar muscle reinnervation. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43: 8–15.
35.
Haninec P, Kaiser R, Dubový P. Collateral sprouting after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without perineurial window. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 609–614.
36.
Czarnecki P, Huber J, Szymankiewicz-Szukała A, Górecki M, Romanowski L. End-to-side versus free graft nerve reconstruction – experimental study. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 10428. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310428.
37.
Papalia I, Lacroix C, Brunelli F, d’Alcontres FS. Direct muscle neurotization after end-to-side neurorrhaphy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17:237–246.
38.
M. Górecki, et al.: Brachial plexus and nerve reconstruction Issues of Rehabilitation, Or 34 thopaedics, Neurophysiology and Sport Promotion – IRONS.
39.
Battiston B, Artiaco S, Conforti LG, Vasario G, Tos P. End-to-side nerve suture in traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34: 656–659.
40.
Tos P, Colzani G, Ciclamini D, Titolo P, Pugliese P, Artiaco S. Clinical applications of end-to-side neurorrhaphy: an update. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 646128. DOI: 10.1155/2014/646128.
41.
Davidge KM, Mackinnon SE. Supercharge end-to-side anterior interosseous to ulnar motor nerve transfer. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: e21–e22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.035.
42.
Baltzer H, Woo A, Oh C, Moran SL. Comparison of ulnar intrinsic function following supercharge end-to-side nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 1264–1272.
43.
Chen SH, Mao SH, Lan CY, et al. End-to-side anterior interosseous nerve transfer for high ulnar nerve palsy. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86: S102–S107. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002657.
44.
Daroszewski P, Huber J, Kaczmarek K, Janusz P, Główka P, Tomaszewski M, Kotwicki T. Realtime neuromonitoring increases safety of scoliosis surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13: 1497. DOI:10.3390/jcm13051497.
45.
Ghatol D, Widrich J. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
46.
Garasz A, Huber J. Review on methodology and interpretation of motor evoked potentials. Issue Rehabil Orthop Neurophysiol Sport Promot 2021: 34: 33–42.
47.
Garasz A, Huber J, Grajek M, Daroszewski P. Motor evoked potentials recorded from muscles versus nerves after lumbar stimulation. Int J Artif Organs 2023; 46: 303–313.