PL EN
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Clinical effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: etiology-based comparison of genetic and non-genetic cohorts for seizure reduction and antiseizure medication burden
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Children Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
2
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-12-05
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-01-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-01-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-27
 
 
Corresponding author
Mateusz Andrzej Zajączkowski   

Department of Children Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects up to 40% of pediatric patients and continues to be a major therapeutic challenge. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established neuromodulatory therapy; however, the impact of genetic etiology on treatment efficacy and antiseizure medication (ASM) burden remains unclear. Conclusions: VNS provides clinically observable seizure reduction in pediatric DRE regardless of etiology, though responses appear more pronounced in non-genetic cases. Genetic etiology should not preclude VNS consideration, as it remains a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy.

Aim:
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of VNS in pediatric DRE, comparing seizure reduction and ASM burden between genetically and non-genetically determined epilepsies.

Materials and methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 18 pediatric patients (aged 4–18 years) with DRE who underwent VNS implantation between 2021 and 2025. Patients were stratified into genetic (n = 8) and non-genetic (n = 10) cohorts. Seizure frequency and ASM exposure were in comparison to before and after implantation using nonparametric tests. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Median duration of VNS therapy was 15 months (interquartile range [IQR] width: 16 months).

Results:
Overall, 67% of individuals exhibited clinical improvement, and 61% achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Median seizure reduction appeared greater in the non-genetic cohort (60%) than in the genetic cohort (20%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.088). Reduction in ASM burden occurred in 50% of non-genetic cases versus 13% of genetic cases. Post-implantation exposure to calcium-channel modulators was significantly more frequent amongst non-genetic patients (p = 0.036).

Conclusions:
VNS provides clinically observable seizure reduction in pediatric DRE regardless of etiology, though responses appear more pronounced in non-genetic cases. Genetic etiology should not preclude VNS consideration, as it remains a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Cui TY, Wu H, Tang CY, Wang XF, Li TF, Zhou J. Surgical outcomes of patients with genetically refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seizure 2024; 120: 124–134.
 
2.
Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, et al. Definition of drug-resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 1069–1077.
 
3.
Doddamani RS, Agrawal M, Samala R, Ramanujam B, Chandra PS, Tripathi M. Vagal nerve stimulation in the management of epilepsy – recent concepts. Neurol India 2020; 68: S259–S267. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.302475.
 
4.
Hajtovic S, LoPresti MA, Zhang L, Katlowitz KA, Kizek DJ, Lam S. The role of vagus nerve stimulation in genetic aetiologies of drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022; 29: 667–680.
 
5.
Wheeler M, De Herdt V, Vonck K, et al. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy among patient subgroups: a re-analysis using the Engel classification. Seizure 2011; 20: 331–335.
 
6.
Chrastina J, Novák Z, Zeman T, et al. Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a 10–17 year follow-up study. Seizure 2018; 59: 41–47.
 
7.
Katagiri M, Iida K, Ishihara K, et al. Anti-seizure effect and neuronal activity change in the genetic-epileptic model rat with acute and chronic vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsy Res 2019; 155: 106159. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106159.
 
8.
Borowicz-Reutt K, Czernia J, Krawczyk M. Genetic background of epilepsy and antiepileptic treatments. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 16280. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216280.
 
9.
Hammond EJ, Uthman BM, Reid SA, Wilder BJ, Ramsay E. Vagus nerve stimulation in humans: neurophysiological studies and electrophysiological monitoring. Epilepsia 1990; 31: S51–S55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1990.tb05850.x.
 
10.
Weber YG, Biskup S, Helbig KL, von Spiczak S, Lerche H. The role of genetic testing in epilepsy diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2017; 17: 739–750.
 
11.
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Valentin A, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy: an Irish retrospective observational study. Seizure 2023; 112: 98–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.019.
 
12.
Samanta D. Efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a scoping review. Children (Basel) 2024; 11: 905. DOI: 10.3390/children11080905.
 
13.
Xie H, Ma J, Ji T, Liu Q, Cai L, Wu Y. Vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy of monogenic aetiology. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 951850. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.951850.
 
14.
Marques P, Moloney PB, Ji C, et al. Do germline genetic variants influence surgical outcomes in drug-resistant epilepsy? Epilepsy Res 2024; 206: 107425. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107425.
 
15.
Coryell J, Singh R, Ostendorf AP, et al. Epilepsy surgery in children with genetic etiologies: a prospective evaluation of current practices and outcomes. Seizure 2023; 113: 6–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.10.011.
 
16.
Ramantani G, Wirrell E. Epilepsy surgery in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 159: 109985. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109985.
 
17.
Geng G, Hu W, Meng Y, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treating developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in young children. Front Neurol 2023; 14: 1191831. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1191831.
 
18.
Chen S, Yang X, Xu S, et al. Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective single-center study. Front Neurol 2025;16:1564735. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1564735.
 
19.
Kostov KH, Kostov H, Larsson PG, et al. Norwegian population-based study of effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9: 704–716. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12908.
 
20.
Orosz I, McCormick D, Zamponi N, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a European long-term study up to 24 months in 347 children. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 1576–1584. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12762.
 
21.
Elliott RE, Rodgers SD, Bassani L, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7: 491–500. DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10505.
 
22.
De Herdt V, Boon P, Ceulemans B, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007; 11: 261–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008.
 
23.
Arcand J, Waterhouse K, Hernandez-Ronquillo L, Vitali A, Tellez-Zenteno JF. Efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: is it the stimulation or medication? Can J Neurol Sci 2017; 44: 532–537. DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2017.46.
 
24.
Muthiah N, Zhang J, Remick M, et al. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in children age six and younger. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 112: 107373. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107373.
 
25.
Potnis O, Biondo G, Sukonik R, et al. Seizure frequency trends over time in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy. JAMA Neurol 2025. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.4085.
 
26.
Winter Y, Sandner K, Glaser M, et al. Synergistic effects of vagus nerve stimulation and antiseizure medication. J Neurol 2023; 270: 4978–4984. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11825-9.
 
27.
Labar DR. Antiepileptic drug use during the first 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation therapy: a registry study. Neurology 2002; 59(suppl 4): S38-S43. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.59.6_suppl_4.S38.
 
28.
Suller Marti A, Mirsattari SM, MacDougall K, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with therapy-resistant generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2020; 111: 107253. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107253.
 
29.
Yang J, Kim S, Kim K, Chae J, Lim B, Phi J. Predictors of seizure outcome for vagus nerve stimulation in children. Res Sq [Preprint] 2020. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-15356/v1.
 
30.
Ma J, Wang Z, Cheng T, et al. A prediction model integrating biomarkers and clinical features to identify responders to vagus nerve stimulation. CNS Neurosci Ther 2022; 28: 1838–1848. DOI: 10.1111/cns.13923.
 
ISSN:2300-0767
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top